[ MESSAGE SENT ]
THANK YOU.
WE WILL WRITE BACK.
Usually within a couple of days. If it is urgent, hello@ailleurs.co reaches us directly.
[ SAY SOMETHING ]
A route worth walking, a place we got wrong, a story you want to write for the journal. We read everything, and we answer the ones that ask a real question.
Read the journal[ MESSAGE SENT ]
Usually within a couple of days. If it is urgent, hello@ailleurs.co reaches us directly.
[ BEFORE YOU WRITE ]
One inbox, two people, and no assistant.
Being clear about this saves us both a round trip.
A hut that closed, a path rerouted, a lake with a car park where the field used to be. Corrections get priority over everything else in the inbox, and the piece gets edited with a note saying what changed.
One paragraph on the place and one on what happened there. Not a pitch deck and not a finished draft — we would rather read the idea than the execution. Photographs help but are not required.
When to go, whether the pass is open, whether a walk is manageable with children. We answer what we actually know and say so plainly when we do not.
We take no money from the places we write about, and no payment for a mention. The independence is the only thing making the recommendations worth reading.
The message lands in one inbox that both of us read. There is no ticketing system, no autoresponder and nobody whose job it is to triage you — which is why a reply takes two days rather than two minutes, and why it is written by the person who knows the answer.
If you are pitching, expect a real response either way. A no comes with a reason, because a pitch rejected without one teaches you nothing and we have both been on that end of it.
Write directly to hello@ailleurs.co. It reaches exactly the same place. The form exists because some people prefer it, not because it does anything clever.